CGM Insights

CGM Insights features Policy, Issue, and Research Briefs that share new thinking on governance and human well-being. Produced by scholars around the world, these publications reflect CGM’s role as an impartial research hub for ideas, making complex research accessible.

Institutional Responses to Digital Dissent: Internet Regulation, Free Speech, and State Control in India

Center for Governance and Markets, September 25, 2025


Abhishek Thommandru

Digital platforms have become essential spaces for civic participation and democratic discourse, yet governments increasingly seek to control online content through expansive regulatory frameworks. In India, the world’s largest democracy, citizens face a growing accountability gap as the 2021 Information Technology Rules have fundamentally altered the balance of power between state authorities and tech platforms, with the “hostage provision” making local employees criminally liable for noncompliance. This provision creates a chilling effect where platforms preemptively censor content to avoid government retaliation, leaving citizens with diminished avenues for free expression and democratic engagement. These conditions invoke two questions: How can democratic societies maintain legitimate content governance while preserving constitutional rights to free speech? When do regulatory frameworks cross the line from protecting public order to undermining democratic discourse? This policy brief examines those critical questions in the context of India’s evolving digital governance model.

View Issue Brief

Soft Law All the Way Down: Artificial Intelligence Governance Under Biden and Trump

Center for Governance and Markets, September 16, 2025


Ilia Murtazashvili, Laurence Park and Junyi He

This brief analyzes US federal approaches to artificial intelligence governance under the previous Trump and Biden administrations, along with developments in the early months of Trump’s second term. Despite differing priorities, both administrations relied primarily on soft law—nonbinding executive orders, voluntary industry standards, and advisory frameworks—over formal regulation. The result has been a market-driven, decentralized governance model that emphasizes innovation and competitiveness but offers limited enforcement and oversight. In contrast to regulatory-heavy models in the European Union and China, the US approach remains rooted in public-private coordination, industry leadership, and flexible federal action

View Issue Brief

The AI Accord: The Gulf's Role in a Rewired Global Order

Center for Governance and Markets, August 4, 2025


Kobby Barda

The Gulf states, led by Saudia Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, are working to transition their economies from reliance on oil to positions as players in a world dominated by artificial intelligence (AI). By leaning into nuclear and renewable energy to help fuel energy-hungry AI and by securing alliances with the United States and other countries seeking to out-position China in the technology space, the Gulf states hope to secure a place at the forefront of the new international order.

View Issue Brief

Building the AI Workforce: The Need for Accurate Data to Inform US Policy

Center for Governance and Markets, August 21, 2025


Ilia Murtazashvili, Dominique Lazanski and Beth Schwanke

Limitations in the prevailing measures hamper the accurate evaluation of the domestic artificial intelligence (AI) workforce. Accelerating the timeline for revising the Standard Occupational Classification system to create a technical AI occupational category could increase the prospects that AI policies will improve AI competitiveness, especially through more granular measures of the way AI is changing the nature of jobs. While AI is unquestionably a future foundation for national security and economic competitiveness in the United States during the digital era, American interests will be best served by a deliberate, measured, and data-driven workforce policy that builds on national strengths.

View Policy Brief

Political Parties as Knowledge Hubs

Center for Governance and Markets, August 5, 2025


Aylon Manor

Current discussions about democratic reform focus heavily on electoral systems and constitutional structures while overlooking the critical role of political parties as key intermediary organizations. Parties struggle to balance policy expertise with electoral considerations, thereby creating challenges for effective governance. Reimagining political parties as knowledge hubs—organizations that systematically gather, assess, and refine information—offers a promising pathway to improving democratic decision-making without requiring major constitutional changes.

View Research Brief

Green Dreams and Workforce Realities: Renegotiating Differences in Polycentric Governance for Deforestation-Free Products

Center for Governance and Markets, July 30, 2025


Sara Lorenzini

This policy brief discusses the European Union Regulation on Deforestation-Free Products (Regulation 2023/1115). As the EU is a major market for commodities driving global deforestation and forest degradation, the regulation is a critical step toward reducing the bloc’s environmental footprint and aligning trade with sustainability goals. A result of years of struggle, bargaining, and negotiation between different stakeholder groups, the regulation is as necessary as it is potentially problematic if smallholder farmers’ demands are not considered. The analysis suggests that, while closing regulatory gaps around the legality and sustainability of the forest and agricultural commodities supply chain is unquestionably urgent, the policy’s effectiveness and the justice it attempts to impart will be best served by addressing key demands of targeted communities at the local level and supporting them in the implementation phase, rather than by adopting a punitive approach.

View Policy Brief

Self-Governance Reform in Imperial Russia: An Unlikely Success Story

Center for Governance and Markets, June 1, 2025


Dmitrii Kofanov

This policy brief summarizes research on the introduction of local self-government in the 19th-century Russian Empire—a context marked by authoritarian rule, economic underdevelopment, and weak institutions. De- spite these constraints, the study finds that municipal representative institutions significantly improved local fiscal capacity and public service provision. The findings contribute to broader debates on decentralization by demonstrating that self-governance can yield tangible benefits even in adverse settings.

View Research Brief

The BioForge Manufacturing Center and Economic Development in Hazelwood: Prospects and Challenges

Center for Governance and Markets, June 10, 2025


Ilia Murtazashvili, Sreya Abraham, Catie Creiman and Junyi He

America’s Rust Belt is often defined by deindustrialization, particularly the collapse of steel, but manufacturing remains alive and is shifting toward the bioeconomy. In Hazelwood—a once steel-centered Pittsburgh neighborhood—the BioForge Manufacturing Center, backed by the University of Pittsburgh and the Richard King Mellon Foundation, embodies this transition. In the near term, encouraging small-scale entrepreneurship, including Black-owned businesses, and construction jobs through innovative worker-training programs can drive inclusive growth. Over the long term, BioForge and the broader tech focus of Hazelwood Green Industrial Park offer both opportunities and challenges to ensure that residents benefit from emerging tech jobs.

View Research Brief